|
ASAE
MEMBERSHIP DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL
CONFERENCE CALL
April 3, 2001
Minutes
Present: Jim Steele, Nolan Clark,
Dennis Larson, Michael Ngadi, Ken Lomax, Ted Tyson, Conly Hansen, Gary
Anderson, Jeremiah Davis, John Reid, Marilyn Maddox, Mark Crossley
The meeting was called to order
at 2:05 p.m.
Overview of Agenda
1. Call to Order &
Introduction of Members on Call
2. Overview of Dues Committee
Progress & Discussion of Retiree Dues
- Composition of Committee
- Progress to Date
- Review Current Dues Structure & Impact of
Retiree Dues Adjustment
- Recommendations from MDC
3. Life Membership and
Promotional Drive at Annual Meeting
- Definition
- Development Promotional Plans
4. Proposal from the ASAE
Foundation re: Grass Roots Funding for Section Use
- Overview of Proposal
- Feedback from Section Steering Committee
- Comments from MDC
5. Announcements
- Request for Initiative Fund Proposals
- Request for 2002 Budget Items
- Next MDC Meetings - Sacramento Convention
Center
Sunday July 29th 1:30 -3:30 p.m.,
Room 311 and Thursday August 2nd 8:00 - 10:00 a.m., Room 105
- Written reports due from District Reps. &
Committee Chairs to headquarters by 6/30/01
- Items to be added to the agenda must be to
headquarters by 6/30/01
As a recap of the agenda, the
minutes are as follows:
Mark Crossley conducted a review
of all present.
Overview of Dues Committee
Progress & Discussion of Retirees Dues
The meeting began with an overview of the Dues Committee appointed by Harmon
Towne and their progress to date. The Dues Committee, comprised of Fred Payne
(chair), Carly Washmon, Carroll Goering, Dan Wambeke, Gene Giacomelli, Stan
Weeks and Ted Tyson, was appointed to review the current ASAE dues in light of
recent budget deficits. Attachment A is a copy of the charge to the Dues
Committee. The Committee is to report back to the Board of Trustees at their
April Meeting in St. Joseph and make a draft recommendation on a dues increase
for 2002 (Attachment B). They have been looking at a 25-year history of dues
revenue and dues increases. Since 1975, there have been three dues increases -
in 1980, 1987 and 1992. The Committee is looking at recommending a $20-30 dues
increase focused on ASAE's largest member population, aged 35-64 with a lower
increase spread out over the other age ranges, students/preprofessionals,
student transfers, and sustaining members. As it currently stands, members over
65 years of age who have not yet reached sustaining member status and the three
international membership promotional rates ($15, $35 & $55) would not
increase. Life Member payments and calculations would not change except for the
new dues rates that may be in effect at the time of payment. The Committee
would like to bring dues in line to reflect accumulated inflation rates since
1992 on an individual membership, not based on total dues revenues.
The conversation then turned to
retiree dues (Attachment C). An overview of all current dues levels, which may
encompass ASAE members over age 65, was given. The proposal includes sustaining
($55), life membership, and a 10% reduction ($76) for members who are over 65
and have not yet reached sustaining member qualification status. A number of
opinions were expressed in reaction to the possibility of raising retiree dues,
but the general opinion was that these dues not be increased. Headquarters
reported that retirees were by far the most vocal on the issue of believing
their dues are currently too high. It was suggested that the reason retirees
are complaining about current retiree dues rates is because ASAE does not
provide enough services to make their membership valuable. We need to review
retiree membership categories and better inform members of what their options
are and why their membership is still valuable to them at this point in their
lives. With these and other points at in mind, the following motion was
offered:
Motion: The entire dues structure
and options for ASAE membership for retirees needs to be further studied before
a dues increase is proposed or recommended. Second.
Discussion: During the
discussions, several points were made and suggested to be included in a general
sense as content and in clarifying the intent of this motion. It was pointed
out that the MDC has good representation on the Dues Committee. A question was
raised about the basis for a dues increase and how this would be justified for
certain membership categories and not all. The primary impact of a dues
increase on MDC operations might be recruitment and retention of members and no
one knows how to project or quantify this impact. A turn around in recent
declining membership trends is not clear just yet and some felt this reflects
negatively on increasing dues at this time. The MDC should be the prominent
Council in input and debate on any changes in membership dues. The intent of
the motion was also to include an offer from MDC to assist or conduct a
complete review of the ASAE membership structure prior to adoption of any dues
increase.
The motion carried.
It was decided that the MDC
should file a follow-up report to the Dues Committee expressing some of the
points and concerns raised here. It was decided that Mark Crossley would
express the recommendations in a draft letter to the Dues Committee from the
MDC.
Some concern was expressed that
the MDC would not have an opportunity to review the actual dues increase
proposal before adoption by the Board of Trustees. The Council Chair will seek
assurance at the Board of Trustees meeting in St. Joseph on April 20-21, 2001.
Life Membership & Promotional
Drive at the 2001 Annual Meeting
Life membership in ASAE is defined as follows: Any corporate member may attain
life member status by paying the Society at one time the present worth of an
annuity equal to that member's dues for a life expectancy based on current
actuarial tables. In light of a probable dues increase for 2002, the MDC felt
that the Annual Meeting would be a logical time for a life membership
promotion. Members who took advantage of this option before December 31, 2001
would be able to so do under current dues levels, thus saving money compared to
delaying life member payments or annual payments until after the first of the
year. The MDC overwhelmingly endorsed plans for life membership promotion at
the Annual Meeting as well as promotion to the general membership shortly
thereafter.
The plan is to target those
members aged 55 and over who would most likely be interested in life
membership. There was also a suggestion that on the next ASAE invoice, a line
item with the member's life membership total be added as a payment option. This
will be investigated further before formal adoption by the MDC. Some
promotional incentive needs to be granted for payment on site at Sacramento.
This needs to be defined and advertised, however one idea that was discussed
included one year of free membership which could be added into the computations
of Life Membership cost for an on-site payment. Plans to promote life
membership at Sacramento will continue with periodic updates sent to the MDC
for review. MDC members who are willing to volunteer some time for this
promotion at the membership booth in Sacramento should contact Mark Crossley.
Ted Tyson, Conly Hansen and others have agreed to volunteer some time as their
schedules in Sacramento allow.
Proposal from the ASAE Foundation
re: Grass Roots Funding for Section Use
A proposal from the ASAE Foundation to assist and strengthen Section
programming and activities through a grant program was reviewed (Attachment D).
The structure of the proposal is so that it allows for ample room for
creativity on the part of Sections requesting funds for various activities. The
justification for funds will determine whether or not Sections receive funding.
There is currently a ballot out
to the Section Steering Committee (SSC) (Attachment E) asking for their
recommendation and endorsement of the proposal. The deadline for the ballot is
April 6, 2001. The voting thus far is in favor of the proposal with a few minor
changes. Assuming recommendation by the SSC, the proposal will be amended to
reflect the proposed changes by the SSC and will be formally recommended to the
MDC. The MDC will then ballot the amended proposal with recommended amendments
at that point. The outcome of the MDC ballot and any amendments and
recommendations of the MDC will be reported to the ASAE Foundation at their
meeting later this month in St. Joseph.
Announcements
The following items will have a June 30, 2001 deadline. All items should be
sent to Mark Crossley at h, ASAE Headquarters.
-
Initiative Fund Proposals from MDC Committees. E-mail message requesting
proposals and outlining guidelines to be sent in early May.
- Request for 2002 Budget Items. An e-mail
message will also be sent in May to Committee Chairs requesting budget items to
be added to the MDC portion of the budget.
- Written Reports from District Reps. &
Committee Chairs. Reports will be sent ahead of time to MDC members for review
before the meetings in July/August in Sacramento.
- Agenda Items for Sacramento. Call for agenda
items will be sent by e-mail to Committee Chairs in early June. A draft agenda
will be posted on the MDC Web page no later than June 10, 2001.
Next MDC Meetings - Sacramento
Convention Center
- Sunday July 29, 2001, 1:30 -3:30 p.m., Room 311
- Thursday August 2, 2001, 8:00 - 10:00 a.m.,
Room 105
|